Antisémitisme : racisme envers les Juifs & Israël

C' EST UN MALADE CE TYPE ...il me dégoute

Font:
SPIEGEL INTERVIEW WITH IRANIAN PRESIDENT AHMADINEJAD
'We Are Neither Obstinate nor Gullible'
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad spoke with SPIEGEL about what he expects from US President Barack Obama, why America's new Afghanistan strategy is wrong and why Iran should have a spot on the UN Security Council.

SPIEGEL: Mr. President, so far you have traveled to the United States four times to attend the General Assembly of the United Nations. What is your impression of America and the Americans?

Ahmadinejad: In the name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate, I am pleased to be able to welcome you to Tehran once again, after our extensive conversation almost three years ago. Now on the USA: Of course, one cannot get to know a country like the United States in short visits, but my speech and the discussions at Columbia University were very special to me. I am quite aware that a distinction must be drawn between the American government and the American people. We do not hold Americans accountable for the faulty decisions of the Bush administration. They want to live in peace, like we all do.


REUTERS
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad says: "We have no interest in building a nuclear weapon."
SPIEGEL: The new US president, Barack Obama, directed a video address to the Iranian nation three weeks ago, during the Iranian New Year festival. Did you watch the speech?

Ahmadinejad: Yes. Great things are happening in the United States. I believe that the Americans are in the process of initiating important developments.

SPIEGEL: How did you feel about the speech?

Ahmadinejad: Ambivalent. Some passages were new, while some repeated well-known positions. I thought it striking that Obama attached such high value to the Iranian civilization, our history and culture. It is also positive that he stresses mutual respect and honest interactions with one another as the basis of cooperation. In one segment of his speech, he says that a nation's standing in the world does not depend solely on weapons and military strength, which is precisely what we told the previous American administration. George W. Bush's big mistake was that he wanted to solve all problems militarily. The days are gone when a country can issue orders to other peoples. Today, mankind needs culture, ideas and logic.

SPIEGEL: What does that mean?

Ahmadinejad: We feel that Obama must now follow his words with actions.

SPIEGEL: The new US president, who has called your aggressive anti-Israeli remarks "disgusting," has nevertheless spoken of a new beginning in relations with Iran and extended his hand to you.

Ahmadinejad: I haven't understood Obama's comments quite that way. I pay attention to what he says today. But that is precisely where I see a lack of something decisive. What leads you to talk about a new beginning? Have there been any changes in American policy? We welcome changes, but they have yet to occur.


FROM THE MAGAZINE
Find out how you can reprint this DER SPIEGEL article in your publication. SPIEGEL: You are constantly making demands. But the truth is: Your policies, Iran's disastrous relations with the United States, are a burden on the global community and a threat to world peace. Where is your contribution to the easing of tensions?

Ahmadinejad: I have already explained this to you. We support talks on the basis of fairness and respect. That has always been our position. We are waiting for Obama to announce his plans, so that we can analyze them.

SPIEGEL: And that's all?

Ahmadinejad: We have to wait and see what Obama wants to do.

SPIEGEL: The world sees this differently, and we do too. Iran must act. Iran must now show good will.

Ahmadinejad: Where is this world you are talking about? What do we have to do? You are aware that we are not the ones who severed relations with America. America cut off relations with us. What do you expect from Iran now?

SPIEGEL: Concrete steps, or at least a gesture on your part.

Ahmadinejad: I have already answered that question. Washington cut off relations.

SPIEGEL: Are you saying that you would welcome a resumption of relations with the United States?

Ahmadinejad: What do you think? What has to happen? Which approach is the right one?

SPIEGEL: The world expects answers from you, not from us.


PHOTO GALLERY: MAHMOUD AHMADINEJAD'S REPUBLIC
Click on a picture to launch the image gallery (9 Photos)

Ahmadinejad: But I sent a message to the new US president. It was a big step, a huge step. I congratulated him on his election victory, and I said a few things to him in my letter. This was done with care. We have been and continue to be interested in significant changes taking place. If we intend to resolve the problem between our two countries, it is important to recognize that Iran did not play a role in the development of this problem. The behavior of American administrations was the cause. If the behavior of the United States changes, we can expect to see important progress…

SPIEGEL: …that could lead to a resumption of diplomatic relations, perhaps even to the reopening of the embassy, which was occupied in 1979, the year of the revolution?

Ahmadinejad: We have not received an official request in this regard yet. If this happens, we will take a position on the matter. This is not a question of form. Fundamental changes must take place, to the benefit of all parties. The American government must finally learn lessons from the past.

SPIEGEL: But you should not?

Ahmadinejad: Everyone must learn from the past.

SPIEGEL: Then please tell us which lessons you are learning.

Ahmadinejad: We have been under pressure for the past 30 years, unfairly and without fault on our part. We have done nothing…

SPIEGEL: …according to you. The Americans see things quite a bit differently. The 444-day hostage crisis during which 50 US citizens were held from late 1979 until early 1981 in the US Embassy in Tehran is still a collective American trauma today.

Ahmadinejad: But think of the things that were done to Iranians! We were attacked by Iraq. Eight years of war. America and some European countries supported this aggression. We were even attacked with chemical weapons and your country, among others, aided and abetted those attacks. We did not inflict an injustice on anyone. We did not attack anyone, nor did we occupy other countries. We have no military presence in Europe and America. But troops from Europe and America are stationed along our borders.

SPIEGEL: The Western governments, including Germany's, are convinced that Iran supports terrorist organizations and that Iran has had dissidents killed abroad. Perhaps mistakes were not just made by the one side?

Ahmadinejad: Do you wish to imply that the troops are deployed along our borders because we allegedly support terrorist organizations?


NEWSLETTER
Sign up for Spiegel Online's daily newsletter and get the best of Der Spiegel's and Spiegel Online's international coverage in your In- Box everyday.

SPIEGEL: We neither said nor implied that. But the accusation of support for terrorism has been made. Where is your constructive contribution?

Ahmadinejad: First of all: We do not commit terror, but we are victims of terror. After the revolution, our president and prime minister were killed in a bombing attack in the building adjacent to my office. Our faith forbids us from engaging in terrorism. And when it comes to the constructive contributions we are being asked to make, we have contributed to stabilization in both Afghanistan and Iraq in recent years. While we were making these contributions, the Bush administration accused us of doing the opposite. Do you believe that problems can be solved with military force and invasion? Wasn't the strategy employed by America and NATO wrong from the start? We have always said that this is not the way to fight terrorists. They are stronger than ever today.

SPIEGEL: Again, we see no evidence of any self-criticism.

Ahmadinejad: Then why don't you tell me what mistakes we are supposed to have made. We have no interest in a historical settling of accounts.

SPIEGEL: You are not insisting that the Americans apologize for the 1953 CIA coup against the democratically elected Iranian Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh?

Ahmadinejad: We don't want to exact revenge. We merely want the Americans to correct their course. Do you truly see any signs that this is happening?

SPIEGEL: Yes, we do. George W. Bush declared Iran a member of the Axis of Evil and he threatened Tehran, at least indirectly, with regime change. There is no longer any mention of these things under Obama.

Ahmadinejad: There are changes in the choice of language. But that isn't enough. For the past 30 years, Germany and other European countries have been under pressure from the Americans not to improve their relations with Tehran. That's what all European statesmen tell us.



1 | 2 | 3 Next

SPIEGEL: Does getting to the root of the problem mean wiping out Israel?

Ahmadinejad: It means claiming the rights of the Palestinian people. I believe that this is to everyone's benefit, to that of America, Europe and Germany. But didn't we want to discuss Germany and German-Iranian relations?

SPIEGEL: That's what we are talking about. The fact that you deny Israel's right to exist is of critical importance when it comes to German-Iranian relations.

Ahmadinejad: Do you believe that the German people support the Zionist regime? Do you believe that a referendum could be held in Germany on this question? If you did allow such a referendum to take place, you would discover that the German people hate the Zionist regime.

SPIEGEL: We are confident that this is not the case.

Ahmadinejad: I do not believe that the European countries would have been as indulgent if only one-hundredth of the crimes that the Zionist regime has committed in Gaza had happened somewhere in Europe. Why on earth do the European governments support this regime? I have already tried to explain this to you once before…

SPIEGEL: …when we argued about your denial of the Holocaust three years ago. After the interview, we sent you a film by SPIEGEL TV about the extermination of the Jews in the Third Reich. Did you receive the DVD about the Holocaust, and did you watch it?


NEWSLETTER
Sign up for Spiegel Online's daily newsletter and get the best of Der Spiegel's and Spiegel Online's internat

Ahmadinejad: Yes, I did receive the DVD. But I did not want to respond to you on this question. I believe that the controversy over the Holocaust is not an issue for the German people. The problem is more deep-seated than that. By the way, thank you once again for coming. You are Germans, and we think very highly of the Germans.

Oui , c'est un fou ! Pour une fois c'est un de leurs qui fait le lèche c.... , seul but - tous contre Israel ! Bien sur un référendum avec des milliers des muslims donne une grande chiffre . Bien malin !
Et encore une fois sur le dos de Israel ils essaient de faire les allies - avant ça été Hitler et aujourd'hui c'est eux .

Bonjour Sonia, vous savez bien que les Musulmans ont toujours été les amis des nazis!!!! souvenez vous du grand Mufti de Jérusalem qui a passé plusieurs années à Berlin, dans une belle villa il y recevait tous les hauts dignitaires du 3ème Reich il a fait tout ce qui était en son pouvoir pour contribuer à la victoire de l'Allemagne: envoyé des saboteurs arabes derrière les lignes britanniques, encouragé le recrutement par les SS de divisions de musulmans Yougoslaves et même facilité l'invasion allemande en Tunisie et en Libye, de plus il était parfaitement au courant de la fameuse "solution finale", il a fait tout ce qu'il pouvait pour empêcher que les victimes promises aux chambres à gaz n'échappent à leur sort et rejoignent la Palestine! et même intervenu personnellement auprès de Ribbentrop pour que plusieurs milliers d'enfants bulgares ne puissent rejoindre la Palestine!!! voilà le beau personnage!!

Bonjour Claude ,
oui , Claude je le sais . Hitler été fascinée par eux , pas en étant muslims , mais a cause de leur coran , qui invite de tuer les mécréants ! Donc très utile au sale boulot . Mais âpres un hypothétique victoire ? Je ne pense pas qui la "amitié" soit dans le cas comme ça encore de utilité .
Même chose aujourd'hui , ça sont eux qui cherchent une alliance , mais pareil , les amis la sont demain rien qui les mécréants !

Par contre Claude pour les enfants de Bulgarie je ne savais pas ! Même quand on a fait beaucoup des recherches la déçu , on apprend encore et encore les choses !
Dernièrement en cherchant sur Hitler je suis tombée sur une site : Radio Islam et la un très long article : Hitler et les musulmans . http;//www.radioislam.org/hitler/islam.htm .Bon c'est a leur sauce , mais quand même on apprend les choses ! Et âpres :
radioislam.org/islam/french/debat/khan1.htm !
Faites un tour et tout les autres aussi !!!
On est arrivé au même point qui en 39 , sauf les rôles sont inversées ! Aujourd'hui sont les fous de allah qui cherchent le appui des anciens et nouveau nazis !
Pour ça je dise on a plus le temps a perdre pour lutter contre eux !!!!

les "intellectuels" nazis étaient fascinés par l'Islâm, car ils retrouvaient des principes communs : une oumma abstraite, dans laquelle les singularités sont biffées,( il faut bien constater que l'humanisme est absent du Coran),, une inflexibilité dans le combat, l'absence de compassion envers les mécréants, etc.... Ils y voyaient un premier système totalitaire recouvrant l'intégralité de la vie humaine : politique, social, intellectuel, vie privée.... Sans faire de comparaison hative, de fait l'Islâm plus qu'une religion est un système de masse, un système totalitaire.... En même temps, l'islâm est un opium du peuple barrant l'accès à la modernité, au nom de la nostalgie des origines pures celle de l'Islâm des compagnons du prophète.... Nostalgie proche des rêves nazis quant aux mythes des origines ariennes. Questions jusqu'à quand les personnes supportreront cette gigantesque machine à décerveler ???

"Le président iranien mahmoud ahmadinejad a déclaré dans une interview pour le magazine..."

Encore du bourrage de crâne à 2 balles, mais là, il s'adresse à des lecteurs allemands, pas à des iraniens apeurés et en grande partie illettrés. Mais tout lui est bon pour "taper sur Israêl".

A lire attentivement, en particulier, par les France et Co. qui nous bassinent sur ce site en affirmant, je cite une de ses dernières interventions "si Israêl était attaqué, tout le monde civilisé se lèverait pour l'aider".

Dois-je rappeler à cette éminente évangéliste que le nain enturbanné a déclaré officiellement à une tribune de l'ONU qu'il allait "effacer Israêl de la carte". Est-ce que quiconque du monde "civilisé" a, ne serait-ce même que murmuré une désapprobation quelconque à des propos aussi gravissimes??? NOBODY.

Ce nabot persan n'est qu'un grand malade qui devrait avoir une place privilégiée de VIP à Guantanamo, section spéciale "fous à lier", avec très bonne garde...

HAM ISRAEL HAYE (dans les jardins de persepolis où on doit trouver des nains de jardin perturbés à l'effigie du ci-dessus cinglé).