Blog : Lessakele

Apres avoir lu votre article il serait convenable de revoir votre francais qui porte les lecteur quelquefois a avoir
les idees troubles sur la signification de vos titres
Il est plus approprie de lire : LE DENI D'OBAMA A L'EGARD DE LA COMMUNAUTE JUIVE DOIT CESSER
Cela me semble plus correct
une phrase qui ne peut etre utilisee comme celle que l'on peut mettre dans tous les sens et qui veut dire la meme chose en prose ou en poeme comme: "" belle marquise vos beaux yeux me font mourir d'ámour "

Je suis tout à fait d'accord avec vos remarques concernant cet article, ,

BONNE JOURNEE
ELYANE

....JE DIRAI PLUS CLAIREMENT :"""LA HAINE D'OBAMA POUR LES JUIFS """

....EVIDEMMENT , C'EST UN MUZZ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LE MONDE LE SAIT ,L'AMERIQUE VA LE SAVOIR ,LES JUIFS ET ISRAEL VONT DEVOIR AGIR EN CONSEQUENCE ................

C'est dommage,Israel va donc devoir se retourner vers d'autres :Inde,Chine............

Manifestation contre la « dictature » américaine

[Samedi 25/07/2009 23:07]

Un grand rassemblement est prévu lundi au carrefour de France, à Jérusalem, non loin de la résidence du président et de l’ambassade des Etats-Unis. Un défilé est prévu pour protester contre l’ingérence américaine et pour réaffirmer l’indépendance d’Israël.

BRAVO !!!!! pour la MANIF a JERUSALEM, enfin,,,les juifs sortent de leur torpeur...........
Il est evident que depuis le premier jour de son election Obama,nous a ouvert les yeux en appelant la seule personne pour laquelle il voue un culte avoue,Abbas de l'OLP chef d'une bande de terroriste qui encore aujourd'hui affirme qu'il ne reconnait pas ISRAEL.mais qui a des revendications sur nos terres .
Depuis le debut,nous savons qu'Obama prend ses ordres de Abbas,Nóublions pas qu'il etait bien avant son election,un fervant partisan de la cause palestinienne de par ses frequentations douteuses avec les muslims afro-americains,voire meme des negationnistes.
La phrase prononcee par lui meme avant l'election JERUSALEM est une et indivisible capitale de l'etat dísrael n'etait juste dite pour attirer l'electorat juif,d'ailleurs il n'est pas a son premier coup d'essai,bien avant il a charme une femme politicienne qui lui a offert un formidable tremplin,mais qui ne la pas empeche de la trahir et de la poursuivre en justice,voila ce qu'est ce drole d'individu.
yom tov a tous

Je n'ai pas la traduction
Obama's real agenda

Jul. 19, 2009

Anne Bayefsky , THE JERUSALEM POST

President Barack Obama last Monday met for the first time with leaders of
selected Jewish organizations and leaks from the meeting now make one thing
very clear. The only free country in the Middle East no longer has a friend
in the leader of the free world. Obama is the most hostile sitting American
president in the history of the state of Israel.

This was the very first meeting with Jewish community's leaders. Earlier
requests for an audience with major Jewish organizations had reportedly been
ignored. Six months after taking office the president finally got around to
issuing an invitation to stop the bleeding. Increasing numbers of Jews even
among the overwhelming number who voted for Obama ¬ have been voicing
serious concern about his real agenda.

The meeting, however, did not showcase the president's trademark engagement
and dialogue routine. Instead, he decided to cherry pick his Jewish audience
to include pro-Obama newcomers with little support in the mainstream Jewish
world, such as J Street, while blackballing the Zionist Organization of
America. The oldest pro-Israel group in the United States, with a Washington
office second in size only to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee
(AIPAC), was not a voice Obama wanted to hear. This leaves the president
willing to engage Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad but not ZOA
President Mort Klein.

The growing alarm in the Jewish community was also something the White House
was bent on covering up. They refused to put the meeting on the President's
public schedule until it was outed. The White House demanded strict
confidentiality and issued a terse couple of lines that it occurred when it
was all over.

BUT THERE is no papering over the distressing reality that emerged. The
president told his listeners that he preferred putting daylight between the
United States and Israel. His reported justification: "there was no light
between the US and Israeli positions for the last eight years, and no
progress was made."

Evidently, unilateral disengagement from the Gaza Strip, 21 settlements and
9,000 residents counts for nothing. The Palestinian terrorist leadership and
street have refused to accept a Jewish state for the past eight years (and
the previous 53) because the United States did not add sufficiently to
Israel's isolation.

The president apparently believes that the Palestinians are more likely to
end terrorism, incitement to violence and rampant anti-Semitism if the
United States applies more pressure on their victims. Even if Obama doesn't
get it, Mahmoud Abbas does. He is now refusing to negotiate anything with
the new Israeli government until Obama's settlement conditions are met.

During the meeting, the president repeatedly described his new policy in
terms of one of Yasser Arafat's favorite mantras, "even-handedness." That's
diplotalk for a moral equivalence between an Arab war against Jewish
self-determination launched from the day of Israel's birth decades before
any "occupation" and the conditions of third-generation Palestinian
"refugees" kept in limbo pending Israel's destruction. But Obama's
even-handedness was no slip of the tongue. In his Cairo speech, the
president equated the Holocaust to Palestinian "dislocation."

The president promoted his strategy of putting hard public "pressure" on
Israel as a means to build more credibility with Arab states. He must have
meant the kind of credibility that comes from his policy of leaving an "open
door" to Iran after its discredited election.

OBAMA THEN claimed that the widespread perception of an anti-Israel agenda
was all the media's fault because the media is only interested in a
"man-bites-dog" story. When an administration sends a US ambassador back to
Syria though it is still listed as a key state sponsor of terrorism, hosts
terrorist kingpins pursuing Israel's annihilation, and was caught trying to
acquire weapons of mass destruction, the story is far-fetched alright, but
true.

The president joked that Al-Jazeera often airs pictures of him wearing a
yarmulke at the Western Wall. Except the photo-op during the election
campaign had been intended to fool a Jewish audience that is no longer
amused.

Reports also quote the president as claiming Israel has yet to "engage in
serious self-reflection." Considering Israel is a democratic country forced
to send its children into the armed forces for two to three years and its
men into reserve duty for another twenty-five, that isn't the audacity of
hope. It's just plain audacity.

There is no doubt that the pressure on Israel from the Obama administration
is going to get a lot worse, as the President told the group "there is a
narrow window of opportunity for advancing the peace process." Everyone
understood the threat. The narrow window is Obama's self-defined political
ambitions bearing no relationship to the realities of the Middle East ¬or
the welfare of either Israel or the United States.